Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Tell us what you think about the new security measures at BWI.....
Some experts question security value of full-body scannersAfter months of seeking to allay public fears over privacy, the TSA finds itself increasingly answering another criticism of full-body scanners: Some experts say the machines simply don't work. Critics -- including the Government Accountability Office and private security consultants -- say advanced imaging technology can miss too many threats because it relies on human judgment in interpreting the vague, chalky images. Many critics say the scanners should be used in conjunction with metal detectors, rather than being deployed as a primary screening tool. But the TSA defends the scanners, even as it closes in on its goal of 450 installations by year's end. "No technology is going to be the silver bullet, but this is a significant enhancement," says Robin Kane, assistant administrator for the TSA's Office of Security Technology. Chicago Tribune

1 comment:

  1. Let me get this right.

    2 million passengers per day (in the US only) for the past 9 years (since 9/11) equals about 6.5 BILLION passengers.

    One nut tries to blow up a plane with explosives in his underwear which failed. (BTW: You can’t put enough explosives in your underwear to down a plane) and now OUR GOVERNMENT want to strip search or physically pat down all AMERICAN travelers at a cost of billions of dollars.

    Nobody has been killed by terrorists on an American aircraft since 9/11!

    Odds: 1 in 6.5 billion ? or less? the bombs didn't work!
    Powerball 1 in 40 million?
    State lottery 1 in 14 million.

    I'm 162 times more likely to win the state lottery, than to be killed by terrorists on a plane!

    WHAT ARE OUR LEGISLATORS SMOKING?

    What about the 300,000 killed in car crashes in the same period?

    What's wrong with this picture?

    All Facebook Against Airport Full Body Scanners

    ReplyDelete